Cinie

Obama, Barack Obama

In Barack Obama, Politics on June 21, 2009 at 3:24 pm

ObamaBondSo, is Pretendident Big Daddy Baracko Whosayin’ Yomama channeling his inner James Bond, or what?  Due to his tendency to play his personal information cards ridiculously close to his vest, speculation has naturally arisen in many diverse camps that he may be some sort of stealth undercover agent of one of the government’s various alphabet soup covert organizations.  Dunno about that, but in light of the latest Twitter Revolution’s possible origins, I found an MSNBO article about his desire to turn America’s college campuses into recruitment arms of the CIA pretty interesting.  Imagine my surprise, nay, shock, shock, I tellya, to find that said article found yesterday is no longer available there today.  Not.

That’s not to say the piece was deliberately, or even permanently “disappeared.”  To the contrary, MSNBO’s sister source, the Washington Post still has the article up.  But, ya do gotta wonder why it’s no longer available on the Celebritician’s favorite network.  In fact, why was it up there in the first place?

But, let’s back up a minute.  The protests in Iran, originally supposed to be in response to allegations of voter fraud by opposition candidate Mir Hossein Mousavi, have been characterized as a women, youth and student-led revolt.  With the Iranian government’s crackdown on news reports, it’s pretty easy to see how the anonymous, unverifiable tweets, photos and emails could be manipulated by outside agents infiltrating college campuses specifically for that purpose.  That doesn’t mean that the concerns of the protesters are illegitimate, or that the violence and confrontations are staged, however it could be that the hornet’s nest has been deliberately poked with a stick by entities with an agenda of their own.  That’s what makes this little story so compellingly interesting:

The Obama administration has proposed the creation of an intelligence officer training program in colleges and universities that would function much like the Reserve Officers’ Training Corps run by the military services. The idea is to create a stream “of first- and second-generation Americans, who already have critical language and cultural knowledge, and prepare them for careers in the intelligence agencies,” according to a description sent to Congress by Director of National Intelligence Dennis C. Blair.

In recent years, the CIA and other intelligence agencies have struggled to find qualified recruits who can work the streets of the Middle East and South Asia to penetrate terrorist groups and criminal enterprises. The proposed program is an effort to cultivate and educate a new generation of career intelligence officers from ethnically and culturally diverse backgrounds.

Of course, for the theory that the Twitter Revolution might possibly have been, ahem, “enhanced,” shall we say, to have any validity, one would think that such a campus recruitment program would have had to already be in effect:

Through grants to colleges and universities, intelligence agencies have been building partnerships with academia and specific professors, some of whom in past decades served as channels for recommending applicants to the CIA and other intelligence agencies. The intelligence community already has a Centers of Academic Excellence Program that funds programs in national security studies at more than 14 colleges and universities, with a goal of having 20 participating schools by 2015. The programs receive between $500,000 and $750,000 a year.

Since 2004, two separate programs have been in effect, one to assist 400+ cryptology students, and the other, the Pat Roberts Intelligence Scholars Program, which provided funds to over 800 people, including some current staff, studying other stuff:

The director of national intelligence would make the Roberts program permanent under the new proposal and expand it beyond analysts to include personnel in acquisition, science and technology. It also could be used to help recruit employees by reimbursing them for prior education in critical areas.

Now, it could be that the Iranian governments’ accusations of “Western interference” are just so much paranoid ballyhooing.  But, doncha gotta wonder just what the heck all these new, fresh faced recruits are doing with their bright, shiny,  new skills?  As for Obama’s own CIA connections, I’ll leave that analysis to others.

  1. [...] This from someone who many believe is from a family of spooks.  As in intelligence operative.  As in Was Obama’s Mama a Spook? Joe Cannon wonders the same thing, as does Cinie. [...]

  2. I see. The link I had was from the redirect from the now-gone MSNBC page.

  3. And now it’s missing from the Washington Post too. Let me see if I can drum up some shock myself.

  4. I don’t see the purpose of discussing recruiting the matter so publically. Isn’t that kind of defeating the purpose, it is a covert operation after all. Really I don’t get it with those people.

  5. It has always been the goal of the US to create instability in the middle east. The CIA has been manipulating Iran’s leadership since the overthrow of the Shaw. Look who Obama’s foreign advisor is. His name is Brzezinski. He was Carter’s advisor too. Don’t think for a second the CIA is not involved in this. The goal is to create instability. How better to do that than make both candidates appear to be illegitimate.

  6. The peace sign was used world-wide in the ’60s. In 1968, there was unrest all over the world, probably those in France triggered/reinforced events in the U.S.

    I was surprised by the CIA recruitment story too. The CIA has always recruited on campuses–notably ivy league campuses like Yale and Harvard, but not limited to those. But I don’t remember it being discussed so openly before. That really creeped me out.

    • BB, I still find the obvious embrace of Western iconography a little suspect in an Anti-American environment.

  7. i am gonna make this one simple, if you believe the iranian government’s accusations that western intelligence interferred with their elections, im just a little shall we say shocked

    • Has nothing to do with what the Iranian government claims. It’s the way I’ve seen events unfold from the beginning. And, you should be shocked.

  8. Well now…. the plot thickens:

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124562668777335653.html#mod=rss_whats_news_us

    “The Iranian regime has developed, with the assistance of European telecommunications companies, one of the world’s most sophisticated mechanisms for controlling and censoring the Internet, allowing it to examine the content of individual online communications on a massive scale.”

  9. Something very “different” is happening there. that is for sure.

    Is it the workings of the CIA? An outgrowth of political globalization? Or merely a hundred thousand young people caught up in the moment and wishing to be like Americans??

    I am not sure we will ever know.

  10. The protests in Iran may well have been initially incited by western intelligence agencies, specifically the CIA. However, the V for victory isn’t necessarily an indicator of that. Since its use in WWII, it has become an internally recognized symbol. For example, the Polish Solidarity movement used it, despite the fact that no V exists in the Polish language (W carries the V sound).

    Notice in the pictures how many signs are written in English, not Farsi. The protesters are clearly trying to play to an international audience as well as their own government.

    • The “V” is being reported as a peace sign not a victory sign. While I’m aware that news travels swiftly and easily worldwide nowadays, use of a Western icon could well be interpreted as deliberately provocative.
      The fact that so much of the info is being written in English, both online and in protest, again, is as provocative as it is suspicious. Just how representative of the average Iranian are the English-speaking ones?

  11. I also feel that the CIA is involved in this. I also think these demonstrations kind of happened rather “spontaneously” before anyone could determine if the vote was corrupt or not. Also, the alternative candidate has a history not much different than the current leader and the mullahs run the country anyway. And if things are so bad, why is it that a young woman in a country that suppresses women has a cell phone to start out with? Furthermore, since when do “young people” have the wisdom to run the world? I’m not ready to jump on anybody’s band wagon on this one.

  12. http://troglopundit.wordpress.com/2009/06/17/a-female-protester-in-iran-wearing-traditional-garb-flashing-the-peace-sign-with-a-green-hand-and-talking-on-a-cell-phone/

    Isn’t the peace sign a pretty Western icon?

    The “V-sign”, also called the “peace sign” and the “victory sign,” is a hand gesture with the index and middle fingers open and all others closed, facing the viewer. Originally strictly a sign for victory, it developed into a peace sign during protests against the Vietnam War (and subsequent anti-war protests) and by the counterculture as a sign of peace. Because the hippies of the day often flashed this sign (palm out) while vocalizing “Peace”, it became popularly known through association as the peace sign. Originally, however, its symbolic meaning was love; signing “love” and saying “peace” was a hippie anthem and mutual greeting.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peace_symbol

  13. Cinie,

    Take a gander at this:

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/fhashemi/3611830781/

    Just for old time’s sake….

    SYD

  14. I’ll just say that….

    There is something awfully polished about some of the “news” that we are receiving via twitter and youtube. The nature of the “grassroots” in Iran are reminiscent of a certain astroturfing technique of which David Axelrove is the creator.

    I’m not saying that there are not children being martyred on the streets of Tehran. I believe there are. But… that may well be because of their gullibility. We’ve seen it here as well… how the young flock to support the astroturfers, because they cannot recognize what they are really seeing….

    All they know is that they “hope” for “change.” And they blindly follow anyone who promises them that change…. whether there is any evidence the person can deliver or not.

    Once again, we need to remain skeptical.

    • (big time snark alert)

      Now, now, SYD, our government, its politicians and advertising and public relations firms don’t employ AstroTurfing propaganda techniques to lure Sheeple into jumping to deliberately obvious conclusions, do they? Surely you jest. Why, that’s just the kind of delusional skepticism one would expect from angry old bitter knitters who can’t get over a stolen election that robbed them of their preferred candidate and mount the unity pony.