Cinie

Archive for January 1st, 2009

Breaking America’s Glass Color Barrier

In Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Politics on January 1, 2009 at 7:41 pm

vanessaIn reflecting upon the historic nature of the election of Barack Obama as America’s first black president, I’m reminded of another moment in our recent  history when the country’s color barrier was shattered.  In 1984, beautiful, talented, intelligent, and yes, articulate, Vanessa Williams tore down the walls of one of the strongest bastions of white entitlement at that time, the Miss America pageant.  Until that point, women of color were pretty much excluded from competition, even when token contestants were allowed entree to it’s rarefied atmosphere, there was scant expectation of them attaining victory.  However, Williams, standing head and shoulders above the field, simply could not be denied.  While we now take fully integrated competition in the fading glory of the event for granted, at the time, Williams’ victory seemed every bit as momentous as Obama’s.

As America’s Constitutional preclusion of blacks as citizens prevented African Americans from from holding elected office, for many years before the crowning of a black woman, the Miss America pageant was also institutionally racist.  Though the envelope had been steadily pushed, women who were not examples of pure, lily-white virtue faced an often insurmountable hurdle.  Even in the case of some white women, like Bess Meyerson, Miss America 1945, being Jewish almost cost her the crown.  From PBS:

The pageant’s long history of excluding women of color dates from its beginnings. At some point in the 1930s, it was formalized in the notorious rule number seven of the Miss America rule book. Instituted under the directorship of Lenora Slaughter, rule number seven stated that “contestants must be of good health and of the white race.” As late as 1940, all contestants were required to list, on their formal biological data sheet, how far back they could trace their ancestry. In the pageant’s continual crusade for respectability, ancestral connections to the Revolutionary War or perhaps the Mayflower would have been seen as a plus.

It is no surprise that the nation’s first black Miss America was fair-skinned, deemed not quite black enough by some blacks and far too black by some whites.  “Light, bright, and damn near white,” was the sentiment of some African Americans, displeased that the coronation of such a light skinned black woman did nothing to validate the acceptance of the natural beauty of darker complexioned women with thicker lips and wider, blunter noses.

Almost immediately, the public would become divided over this history-making event. On one hand, black people would celebrate it as a defining moment for their race, while radical whites would protest it and even go as far as to threaten Williams’ life. Still, there was another group of African-Americans who would criticize Williams because her skin was too light, her hair was too straight, her eyes were the wrong color and her upbringing was too privileged. In short, they felt that Williams was not black enough, and therefore not a true representation of their race.

“Nigger” was the expression most often used against her in the hate mail she received during her reign from those whites furious that the integrity of an American institution had been compromised.  From Wikipedia:

Williams began competing in beauty pageants in the early 1980s. Williams won Miss New York in 1983, and went to the Miss America national pageant in Atlantic City. She was crowned Miss America 1984 on September 17, 1983 making her the first-ever African American Miss America. Prior to the final night of competition, Williams won both the Preliminary Talent and Swimsuit Competitions from earlier in the week. Williams’ reign as Miss America was not without its challenges and controversies. For the first time in pageant history, a reigning Miss America was the target of death threats and angry racist hate mail.

While there are some obvious similarities in the stories of Williams and Obama, the most striking being that their middle class blackness was questioned and assailed for it’s “Huxtable-esque” in-authenticity

Vanessa grew up in a cozy community named Millwood (pop. 2,500), about 40 miles northeast of New York City. For years the Williamses were the only black family in town, but Vanessa never felt different. Her parents, Milton and Helen, taught music to high school students in neighboring exurbs and were cultivated, prosperous. “We had a real nice raised ranch house, great clothes, new bikes, good foreign cars, a pool in the yard—I missed a lot of the black urban experience.”

…there are also major differences between the two.  Unlike the empty suit clad Naked Emperor, there was never any question as to Williams’ qualifications.  She actually had to answer the questions, sing the song, and wear the swimsuit.  She also fulfilled her duties as Miss America admirably, always honoring the blacks and women who came before her for their sacrifice.   Until the “scandalously sexy” photos of her surfaced, causing those predisposed to object to her holding the crown to wax apoplectic about her “unworthiness,” giving them an excuse to hide their racism behind the fake outrage attendant to the convenient adaptation of outdated, Victorian mores, Williams served exemplarily.  The hypocrisy of a culture celebratory of the judgment of scantily-clad women on superficial criteria condemning a woman for exploiting those same qualities on her own terms ws never acknowledged.  Secondly, contrary to the Astroturf tools of David Axelrod in the media and blogosphere, fond of manufacturing false racial controversy on Obama’s behalf, hardly anyone objected to Obama’s candidacy simply on the basis of his race.  In fact, in the grand scheme of things, his exploitation of his bi-racial background afforded him a huge advantage.

There is no question that Vanessa Williams’ shoulders are among those upon whose Barack Obama stands, she who actually faced bigotry in all of it’s ugly forms before and after society’s misogyny joined hands with its racism, forcing her to resign in shame, only to emerge victorious, provided a template Obama could do worse than follow.  At the same time, struggling in a society whose standards of feminine comport are external and arbitrary, Williams also has as much, or more, kinship to other modern women as disparate as Hillary Clinton and Sarah Palin.

With the ongoing specter of BlagObama-gate hanging over his head, the possibility of career-ending scandal derailing the Obama presidency is worthy of contemplation.  If this blows up, or other skeletons in his closet were to emerge, enabling political opponents to exploit the country’s residual racism to their advantage, it is not at all clear that he possesses the character, dignity, grace and strength necessary to persevere and overcome.

Like Vanessa Williams.

Or Hillary.

BlagObama Drama In Slow Motions

In Barack Obama, Politics on January 1, 2009 at 6:01 am

ObamaFunny, as we barrel into a 2009 rife with the promise of “hope” and “change,” anticipating the pomp and ceremony of the impending coronation celebrating the ascension of The Great Hype Hope President-Elect-In-Training Wheels to Obamessiah-In-Chief,  replete with all the grandeur and revelry the Inauguration of the Greatest Historically Historic Man Ever Elected for Being Black is due, we find ourselves sidetracked by the spectacle of those on the sidelines busy trying to slow down certain attendant events in order to maximize the impact of an impending train wreck threatening to ruin the festivities for all concerned.

United States Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald has petitioned the court for a 90 day extension in the deadline to indict Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich in the case Fitz is building against him.   Though Blagojevich was arrested December 9, he has only been charged in a criminal complaint, not formally indicted.  Said charges are not specific to attempting to sell Barack Obama’s  vacant Senate seat as has been alleged ad nauseum in the press, but are, according to the motion for extension, as follows:

This investigation was initiated in approximately 2003, and involves multiple
potential defendants. Two individuals, defendants Rod R. Blagojevich and John Harris, were
charged by way of a criminal complaint on December 9, 2008, with: (a) conspiring to defraud
the citizens of Illinois of their right to his honest services, as well as conspiring to obtain
money and property by fraud, in violation of the mail and wire fraud statutes, 18 U.S.C. §§
1341, 1343, 1346, and 1349; and (b) corruptly soliciting and demanding the firing of Chicago
Tribune editorial board members who had been critical of Blagojevich, in exchange for the
awarding of millions of dollars in financial assistance from the State of Illinois, 18 U.S.C.
§ 666(a)(1)(B) and § 2.

That the media refuses to speculate as to the possible identity of the “multiple potential defendants” is no surprise; the same journalists who conspired to refuse to cast aspersions of any sort against Barack Obama at any point in his career can hardly be expected to highlight any negativity that might shine upon him now that they have manipulated the players in this current drama into two factions; dirty, crazy Blago on one side, and the rest of the Obama loving world on the other.  For whatever reason, the inexplicably charmed Obama has never been accused of any sort of wrongdoing in the mainstream media, no matter what scandal swirls around him, it is always depicted as the fault of others; criticism and questioning of him can only be found on right wing and PUMA blogs.  Whether it is his associations with unsavory characters, his indecisiveness, his flip-flopping, his shady political maneuvering, his gaffes, or other unwise decisions, he is above reproach.

Yet, in the current Blagogate situation, his actions raise questions at the very least.  In fact, the whole mess is questionable.  Why was Valerie Jarrett’s name put forth as a candidate for Obama’s Senate seat, only to be abruptly withdrawn?  Why did Obama officially resign his seat so soon?  Why did Rahm Emanuel go to Africa?  Is he back?  Was he there when he officially resigned his own Congressional seat?  Why did the New York Times specualte that Jarrett-staffer, Michael Strautmanis would be mentioned in the Obama clears Obama “internal investigation” when he was not?  Why did Fitzgerald rush to arrest Blagojevich in order to prevent a crime from being committed in the first place, only to seek more time to build a case?  Why is Blagojevich not trying to block the request?  Again, according to the motion, he’s not:

Following telephone calls and/or meetings over the past week, counsel for both
Blagojevich and Harris have represented that they do not object to this motion.

If the government’s five-year investigation has not yet yielded evidence sufficient to indict him, why isn’t Blagojevich yelling for a speedy trial?   Why is he so adamant about fulfilling his gubernatorial duties, going so far as to appoint a Senatorial successor to Obama, and why is the Illinois legislature allowing him to while they and the Democratic party simultaneously try like hell to minimize and marginalize him, primarily in the media?   One of the few straight talkers about Obama, John Kass, ironically of the same Chicago Tribune Blags is accused of trying to manipulate, points out that the Democrats pretty much brought this current mess upon themselves:

Of course, Tuesday’s fiasco could have been avoided. Democrats in the state legislature could have stripped Blagojevich of his appointment powers and imposed a special election. Obama also could have demanded it. But as he has done so often in his career, Obama avoided a confrontation and looked the other way.

Democrats tried to finesse this, and they allowed Blagojevich the opening he needed, to hold that news conference and defy everybody. And so I’m forced to tip my hat to Gov. Dead Meat on this one, for sheer brazenness.

He’s no jester. And it takes guts to keep a straight face while Democrats about you are losing theirs.

Why?  Why would the Democrats allow things to drag on if they could avoid it?  Why rant and rave about not seating Blagojevich’s appointment, Roland Burris when he shows up for work Tuesday as he says he will, or ceremonially refuse to certify his appointment, giving him the opportunity to file his own state Supreme Court complaint and motion challenging their authority to do such a thing, if Blago could have been nullified weeks ago?  According to Politico, Senate Democrats seem comfortable with a 90 day time frame for their own reasons:

Senate officials tell Politico that if presented with the appointment, they are likely to give the Rules Committee 90 days to determine the propriety of the appointment by looking into such issues as whether Blagojevich received anything in return for it.

“A motion to refer credentials to the committee has the effect of delaying seating,” a Senate Democratic aide said. “The motion is debatable and amendable.”

Another official explained: “That buys us 90 days.”

Ninety days to do what?  Are they betting that the time frame coincides with a federal indictment against Blago?  So what?  If he has already been successfully deemed guilty until proven innocent by the media and his legion of Democratic enemies, don’t they have enough ammunition to impeach him now?   Why didn’t they strip him of his powers and allow for the special election?  Are they that afraid of losing the seat to a Republican?  The other reason given in mid-December for backing away, besides the price tag, was that it would delay an appointment until April, about 90 days from now:

Illinois Republicans have launched a political ad campaign demanding a special election to fill the Senate vacancy that Gov. Rod Blagojevich allegedly tried to sell, hoping to pick up a seat they had no shot at before the scandal.

Democrats, after initially supporting such an election, this week canceled a vote on the matter and backed away in the name of good government. They say an election would cost up to $50 million and leave the state with a Senate vacancy until at least April – giving the new senator an even shorter window before the 2010 campaign cycle heats up.

Clearly the Democrats think the best way to resolve their problems is for Blagojevich to resign, then turn himself in and go to jail.  It’s what on earth would make them think they could force him to do that, and what they think would make it worth their while to even try, at such great potential political expense, that’s the real mystery.  Why is the media so willing to help them get away with it?  And, what’s it got to do with Patrick Fitzgerald, “multiple potential defendants and witnesses,” and “thousands of intercepted phone calls?”

In the motion filed in federal court on Wednesday, United States Attorney Patrick J. Fitzgerald asked for more time because “multiple witnesses” have come forward in recent weeks and investigators have to review “thousands of intercepted phone calls.”