Cinie

Voters Confused? You Bet Your Ass!

In Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Politics on October 1, 2008 at 1:49 am

Slate Magazine, which I grew to hate during the primaries for it’s incessant Obama cheerleading, has an article by Walter Shapiro claiming voters are angry, but too stupid to know why.

A Pew Research Center poll released Wednesday found that 43 percent of all voters admitted that they feel “confused” by the proposed plan to stabilize the financial markets. At the same time, voters grasp that something important is happening — 54 percent say, in response to another question, that they are paying “a lot” of attention to the bailout debate in Washington. Pollster Andy Kohut, the director of the Pew Research Center, said that it was virtually “unparalleled” to have this simultaneous level of interest and confusion in a policy debate. “It’s a tough one to get into the nitty-gritty of,” said Kohut. “It is not like gay marriage that is easy to grasp no matter what your point of view is.”

Hey, Walter, wanna buy a clue?  Maybe what voters are “confused” about is the reason people who get paid to figure stuff out spend so much time looking up their own asses for answers to obvious questions.  We’re “confused” by the fact that the media is so obviously trying to elect a raving lunatic, which Barack Obama is, that they applaud him for doing absolutely nothing to deal with the current economic mess but repeat, over, and over again, that he’s not the guy he’s running against, whose biggest sin, according to Obama, is that he knows the guy who’s been engineering the money train for the last eight years.  The candidate who said, “call me, I got my cell,” the guy who has collected more money from the companies profiting from the restructuring of our financial market than any other, who has also taken more money in his brief tenure from those identified as the major culprits involved in this mess than just about anybody, is for some reason, the media’s fair-haired boy.  Oops, I said, “boy.”  I must be a latent racist, since that’s the only reason I could possibly have to use that particular phrase in that particular instance, or to criticize the Golden Child at all, at least, according to the media.  Never mind that if I am a racist, I must hate myself, ’cause I’ve been black a long time, too.

We’re confused alright, Walter.  It’s hard to figure out how the Democratic party could produce a bill in the House to address the crisis of the imminent collapse of our free market system, or however they framed their “fire-in-a-crowded-theater” clarion call, and then not only not push it through, deliberately sabotage it.  We don’t get that, Walter.  Silly us.

Then there’s David Gergen, who I find considerably more annoying than I would imagine a nest of vipers hatching in my underwear, or a swarm of bees building a hive in my ear to be, who, in a blog post for Anderson Cooper 360 on CNN, bemoans America’s lack of trust in it’s leaders, not just in government, but pretty much, across the board:

Four of the five lowest rated groups in the index were business, Congress, the executive branch, and the press. No wonder the “leaders” of these institutions had so much trouble persuading the general public about the seriousness of our financial mess.

David cites research from The Harvard Center for Public Leadership, which he claims to direct, done in partnership with U.S. News and World Report, and Yankelovich, which states this erosion of trust has been going on for a while:

In the fall of 2005, some 65% said we have a leadership crisis in the country. By 2006, the number had risen to 69%. And last fall, no less than 77% declared there was a crisis of leadership. Moreover, 79% said the United States would decline unless we get better leaders.

Gergen goes on to bitch and moan about the challenges facing Barack Obama and John McCain, as well as all the other pseudo-leaders in other fields, in the face of this growing crisis of confidence, blah, blah, blah. Maybe we’d have more confidence in “leaders” if they didn’t have to commission a stupid study to see what’s right in front of their faces.  The government does a lousy job; that’s why their approval ratings suck.  Both parties are full of corrupt liars.  They always promise “change” in exchange for votes; they get the votes, nothing changes.  “Business” wants 700 billion dollars of taxpayer money to prop up the house of cards they’ve been ripping off those same taxpayers from, and the media is a joke.  Those are pretty good reasons for people to stop trusting them.  And, as far as that “better leaders” thing is concerned, we had one running on the Democratic side that I would have trusted in this crisis with my future, but you guys, Walter and David, were among the worst character assassins out there helping to torpedo her chances to be an effective leader.  That’s why we hate you and your kind.

No, we’re not “confused” about the inefficiency of government, or the complicity of the press, or the greed of the financiers.  We’re “confused” that you seem so surprised that we don’t trust them, or you, as far as we could spit at you from.

And, that pisses us off.

‘Cuz, you’re supposed to be the smart guys.

PUMA

Just Say No Deal

  1. CD, I truly appreciate the compliment and hope you would share your thoughts as often as you feel comfortable. Thanks!

  2. Sugar, the reason you’re not “comfortable” with Obie is because you obviously have a brain and aren’t afraid to use it. Too bad they don’t teach that in school.

  3. Cinie, you are right. It’s this horrible tendency by us to “forget”. McCain is attempting to run a mildly negative campaign, but he’d better put some teeth in it if he hopes to beat this con man because his camp is pulling out all the stops. I keep asking myself if, as a Democrat, I would be that upset with the things Obama “might” do as president if he were to win the election, but I just can’t find a way to say that I would be happy with how he would govern. Not in light of actually having listened to both sides this election season. I’m not comfortable with him and his associates at all. At ALL!

  4. Cinie, your analysis is spot on. It never ceases to amaze me that the press could actually be surprised that we don’t believe a word that comes out of their mouths. Most people know what a lying bunch of propagandists they are, especially those of us who were around when we had a decent press. (It was never perfect, but the press of the Nixon years would never have let Bush get away with the last 8 years).

    I don’t comment very often, but just want to tell you how much I enjoy your perspective and your humor. I stop in here every day. “Nest of vipers hatching in my underwear” was definitely worth the stop! I’m still laughing.

  5. Sugar, the problem as I see it, in a nutshell, is that we Americans have a sound-bite length attention span, so, degenerate, lying, inept incompetents can re-make themselves 2 and three times a day, and nobody notices that this guy is not acting the same way today as he was yesterday. Add to that the fact that “journalistic integrity” is an anachronistic joke about a bygone era when any journalist in Ifill’s position, desirous of that title, would recuse themselves long before it ever became a public issue.

  6. Cinie, what in the world are we going to do???? Did you see the news that Gwen Ifill, who is moderating the debate tomorrow, has written a Pro-Obama book set to be released on Inauguration Day????